Physical integrity and latest legislative changes in Albania
In their everyday activity medical staff is faced with difficult ethical dilemmas. In general, the set of ethical and moral values they believe in makes the difference in confrontation with patients. However, these values â€‹â€‹are not always clear in the day-to-day work of healthcare providers and often conflict resolutions are not well-defined. To make a decision for such dilemmas they have to take in consideration their role as a patientâ€™s advocate, a steward of societal interests, a member of a profession and a private individual. Solving medical ethical problems, especially those arising from legal obligations, such as in cases of compulsory physical examination for search of evidence, makes their work even more difficult and stressful. Some of the questions they are faced with are: Are individualsâ€™ under examination considered â€œpatientsâ€? Are physicians obliged to respect their right for physical integrity and autonomy or are they obliged to intervene nevertheless? Between concurring rights and duties, which one should prevail? How do you strike a balance between conflicting values and legal obligations? Are physicians obliged to execute the request of law enforcement agents, or they can choose to respect the autonomy of the individual? This paper aims to analyze the legislative provisions on compulsory physical examination introduced in Albaniaâ€™s Code of Criminal Procedure on 01 August 2017 and their impact on the activity of Albanian medical examiners and health care providers.
Keywords: bodily integrity, biological evidence, ethics, medical procedure, law.
 Bringedal B, Isaksson RÃ¸ K, Magelssen M, FÃ¸rde R, Aasland OG., Between professional values, social regulations and patient preferences: medical doctors' perceptions of ethical dilemmas, Journal of Medical Ethics, Volume 44, Issue 4, (2018), p.239-243, <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151056>, accessed 28.05.2018
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).